Home
Home

About Financial Advisory

Since 1946 FirstSouthwest has been a trusted leader in public finance. We provide expert financial advisory services to more than 1,600 clients across 21 offices in 10 states.

Benefits
Our financial advisory professionals work together across geographical and practice group boundaries to help  each client seamlessly receive the benefits of the entire Firm’s expertise. These benefits include:
  • Our professionals proactively share the firm's collective specialized expertise, local knowledge and national experience with each client
  • Our professionals are accessible and responsive to each client.
  • FirstSouthwest’s direct participation in the capital markets affords financial advisory clients with the real-time local and national market sensitivity to make informed decisions.
  • FirstSouthwest’s in-house expertise in arbitrage rebate, government investment pools, investment advisory, disclosure, trading and municipal underwriting is readily available to each financial advisory client.
Areas of Expertise
FirstSouthwest maintains deep and proven expertise across a variety of public finance sectors:
  • Airports
  • Benefit Plan Services
  • Convention Centers/Hotels
  • General Obligation
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Education
  • Housing
  • Leasing
  • Ports
  • Public Power
  • Public-Private Partnerships
  • Rapid Transit
  • School Districts
  • Special Districts/Development
  • State Revolving Funds
  • Student Loans
  • Toll Roads
  • Water and Sewer
To learn more about our financial advisory expertise in these sectors, please visit our Sector Expertise page.

 

Case Studies

Alaska Housing Finance Corporation

6/1/2007 12:00:00 AM

Case Study: First-Time Homebuyer Bonds

Client Since: 1994
 
Background
FirstSouthwest’s success in housing is perhaps best exemplified by its extensive involvement in the State of Alaska. The Firm has provided guidance on more than 44 bond issues totaling more than $5.18 billion. FirstSouthwest also has negotiated more than $480 million of floating-to-fixed rate swaps on behalf of Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC). AHFC has taken advantage of many of the innovative developments for housing issuers.
 
AHFC was originally developed to help families find homes after World War II. It has evolved into an organization that now contributes more than $100 million annually to Alaska’s state revenues through cash transfers, capital projects and debt-service payments.
 
Since 1986, it has contributed more than $1.9 billion to the state in the form of direct dividends going into the general fund; providing funds to the state for capital improvements; bonding for projects such as university student housing; purchasing state assets; and deferred maintenance of state-owned property.
 
The Challenge
Since the first tax-exempt housing revenue bonds were issued in the early 1970s, most HFAs have typically desired loan rates 75 to 100 basis points lower than the rates on conventional home loans so they can remain competitive. Beginning in the 1990s, however, that spread became increasingly difficult to maintain. Interest rates steadily dropped while home purchase prices increased. The low interest rate environment generated more demand from potential buyers who were also looking for flexible loan programs to make purchasing a home more affordable. Commercial banks and mortgage lenders responded by providing non-traditional financing such as adjustable rate mortgages and interest-only mortgages.
 
In this environment, AHFC was challenged to continue providing competitive rates on its traditional 30-year mortgages. Needing to borrow debt at a lower cost, AHFC began looking at its financing alternatives. In 2006, AHFC had fixed rate debt of more than $482 million that had been issued in 1997 and 1999. The debt was optionally callable in 2007 and 2009 which presented AHFC with an opportunity to restructure the debt at a lower cost.  
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
In early 2006, forward premiums for forward starting swaps and forward bond purchase agreements were at historic lows. AHFC had pre-Ullman debt (funds issued before the Tax Reform Act of 1986) optionally callable on June 1, 2007 and June 1, 2009. In March 2006, FirstSouthwest, on behalf of AHFC, competitively bid a $239.3 million forward starting swap beginning June 1, 2007 and a $242.6 forward starting swap beginning June 1, 2009.
 
FirstSouthwest examined a database of historical trading patterns of AHFC’s variable rate debt and through regression analysis determined that 70 percent of LIBOR was the appropriate floating index. The swaps were structured to mirror the amortization on the underlying debt, taking into account the 35-year rule for variable rate debt along with the 54-year rule for pre-Ullman debt. Given the size of the swaps, AHFC desired to spread its counterparty risk among different entities as opposed to awarding 100 percent of the swap to any one entity. Therefore, the winning bidder was entitled to an initial 40 percent. In order of bid result, other counterparties were allowed to match the winning bid up to 30 percent of the notional amount.
 
AHFC received five bids for each swap. The pricing was very tight. On the 2007 bid, the cover was 0.2 basis points higher in rate. AHFC locked into a refunding rate of 3.673 percent for its 2007 refunding and 3.683 percent for its 2009 refunding. As this demonstrates, the forward premium for locking in three years out was only one basis point higher than the premium for locking in one year out.
 
The Result
As a result of entering into the forward starting swaps, AHFC was able to lock in to low cost of funds for 30 years. The proceeds of the 2007 and 2009 variable rate demand obligations were then blended with new money fixed rate bond issues, generating below conventional market mortgage rates. This financing allowed AHFC to continue to offer competitive mortgage rates and generate affordable housing for low- and middle-income Alaskan families and individuals.

City of Kingsville, Texas

1/1/2009 12:00:00 AM

Case Study: Comprehensive plan of finance for the City of Kingsville

Client Since: 2001
 
Projects: Improvements to municipal facilities and infrastructure
 
Kingsville, Texas, is home to 27,000 residents and is located in Kleberg County about 157 miles southeast of San Antonio and 48 miles southwest of Corpus Christi. FirstSouthwest has served as the city of Kingsville’s financial advisor since 2001. From 2001 to 2009, FirstSouthwest completed six bond issues totaling more than $25 million in principal amount for the city. The bond issues ranged from $1.2 million to $11.8 million and have been used for multiple purposes including:
  • Water and wastewater system repairs and replacements
  • Solid waste improvements
  • Vehicle and equipment purchases
  • Improvements to city buildings, streets and drainage systems
In January 2009, FirstSouthwest assisted the city with the issuance of $4.2 million in certificates of obligation. The city needed funds for various landfill enhancements, including the development of a new cell and equipment for the solid waste department.
 
In connection with the issuance of the certificates, FirstSouthwest helped the city obtain its first rating with Standard & Poor’s (S&P) by compiling the city’s quarterly investment report, fund balance policy and debt management policy. Standard & Poor’s gave the city an ‘A’ rating and made positive comments about the city’s financial position and management practices.
 
FirstSouthwest worked closely with the city to determine each project’s useful life, so that the life of the bond issue would not exceed the useful life of the assets funded. We also helped the city analyze the security for repayment, being aware of the defined debt service target.
 
Ultimately, the certificates were issued with a 12-year structure, which wrapped around the city’s existing tax supported debt, in order to minimize the tax rate impact. The certificates had a true interest cost of 2.62 percent which was well below projections.
 
In April 2009, FirstSouthwest discovered a refunding opportunity for the city. The city’s series 1998 and 2001 bonds were callable and interest rates at the time provided an economic benefit to the city.
 
As the city analyzed this data in conjunction with its excess general fund balance, it decided to use cash from the general fund to defease the final 2011 maturity of the series 2001 bond issue. Considering the city’s earnings rate on the excess fund balance, the refunding was further optimized by incorporating the defeasance into the overall plan of finance.
 
The series 1998 bonds were refunded with targeted savings in fiscal year ended 2010 in order to minimize the tax rate impact created by the certificates of obligation, series 2009. The series 2009 refunding bonds produced net present value savings of $83,764, reflecting 4.54 percent of par refunded. The combination of the cash defeasance of the 2011 maturity and the refunding produced sufficient savings for the city, which ultimately eliminated the need for a tax rate increase in 2010 in connection with the certificates of obligation, series 2009.
 

Dallas Convention Center Hotel

8/18/2009 12:00:00 AM

Case Study:  Dallas Issues $479.8 Million in Bonds for Convention Center Hotel Project

Client Since:  1956
 
Services Provided by FirstSouthwest:  Financial Advisory
 
Background
Dallas, Texas, is a top ranked convention city but it currently does not have a hotel attached to its 2.1 million square-foot downtown convention center. As a result, the city of Dallas estimates it has missed out on more than $128 million in revenue since 2002 as convention and tradeshow industry organizers have booked their events elsewhere.
 
For more than five years, the city has attempted to develop the hotel project and has overcome numerous obstacles and challenges including a strong voter initiative against the project. The hotel project is critical to Dallas’ ability to maintain its position within the convention and tradeshow industry and to recapture the lost business related to the lack of a convention center hotel. In May 2009, Dallas voters approved a new 1,000-room convention center headquarters hotel which is expected to open in early 2012.
 
The Challenge
The bond market had been highly unpredictable since Wall Street’s meltdown in 2008. The city of Dallas was waiting for the right interest rate environment in which to sell its hotel revenue bonds. A new hotel project would be affordable only if the city could sell 30-year bonds at interest rates of 5.5 percent or lower.
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
FirstSouthwest planned to conduct a successful pricing while limiting the true interest cost (TIC)–net of the Build America Bonds (BABs) subsidy payments–to less than 5.5 percent. The uninsured transaction was rated A2/A+ and was the first hotel financing incorporating bonds authorized under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
 
The pricing consisted of a retail order period on Monday, August 17, 2009, followed by an institutional pricing on Tuesday, August 18, 2009, during which FirstSouthwest advised the Dallas Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation on a $479.8 million hotel revenue bonds, series 2009A,B,C financing.
 
During the retail order period, the market experienced a rally that enabled FirstSouthwest to lock in the BABs pricing and some of the tax-exempt serial maturities. The institutional market proved very receptive to the tax-exempt offering, and by late-morning of August 18, 2009, the underwriting team successfully marketed all the bonds.
 
The series 2009 bond proceeds, along with other funds, were used to acquire six acres of land from the city for the hotel site and to finance the costs required to design, construct, equip, furnish and open a four-star full-service convention center headquarters hotel.
 
The proceeds also fully funded a debt service reserve fund, capitalized interest six months beyond the projected hotel opening date, provided an initial deposit for the hotel’s operating expense reserve fund and paid certain costs of issuance.
 
The series 2009 bonds garnered a net true interest cost of 4.78 percent–72 basis points below the desired target. The net all-in borrowing rate was nearly 70 basis points below the TIC target, at 4.82 percent.
 
The Result
The lower net interest rate of 4.78 percent reduced the overall cost of the project as well as the amount of debt service and also positioned the hotel to become profitable more quickly. Had the bonds sold at the higher rate of 5.5 percent, the city of Dallas would have paid an additional $3 million in debt service per year for 30 years.

Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, Florida

2/5/2010 12:00:00 AM

Client Since:
2002
 
Projects:
Financial Advisory
Structured Products
 
About the Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority
The Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, established in 1963 by the Florida state legislature, operates a 105-mile transportation network through Central Florida. The authority is responsible for the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of:
  • State Road 408 (Spessard Lindsay Holland East-West Expressway)
  • State Road 414 (John Land Apopka Expressway)
  • And also major portions of:
    • SR 528 (Martin B. Andersen Beachline Expressway)
    • SR 417 (Central Florida GreeneWay)
    • SR 429 (Daniel Webster Western Beltway).
Over the next five years, the authority plans to invest more than $1 billion into making much needed transportation improvements around metropolitan Orlando. For years, the authority’s work program in Orange County has eclipsed the amounts spent by state and local governments combined and that trend is expected to continue.
 
 
Case Study - Stage One
FirstSouthwest restructures Expressway Authority’s debt, expands capital program by hundreds of millions of dollars (2003)
 
Background
In August 2002, FirstSouthwest was hired as financial advisor for the authority. As financial advisor, FirstSouthwest developed the authority’s refunding and new money bond program. This was the authority’s first issuance away from the Florida Division of Bond Finance, having received legislative approval in 2002 to issue bonds autonomously.
 
FirstSouthwest developed a plan of finance that lowered the overall costs of financing the authority’s $781 million five-year work plan (2003-2008). The series 2003 program involved four separately sold series of bonds totaling almost $1.1 billion-two series of traditional fixed-rate bonds and two series of variable-rate bonds, which, in turn, were fixed synthetically through a series of interest rate exchange agreements totaling $500 million.
 
The Challenge
FirstSouthwest was challenged to lower the finance costs of the five-year work plan and to analyze outstanding debt in order to capture additional cash flow savings to increase coverage levels.
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
To assist the authority in achieving its objectives, FirstSouthwest initiated the following financing structures:
  • Restructuring the outstanding debt to strengthen the credit position of the new debt issuance.
  • Identifying refunding savings on approximately $702 million of the authority’s outstanding debt.
  • Eliminating future transferred proceeds and yield-blending issues by issuing the new money and refunding bonds as four separate issues instead of one combined issue.
  • Restructuring the outstanding debt and taking advantage of low long-term interest rates which allowed the authority to cash fund a higher percentage of its capital projects and lower its reliance on future debt issues.
The Result
Because the transaction was split into four separate tranches consisting of both refunding and new money components, this complex financing received recognition from The Bond Buyer as one of the most innovative deals in the country in 2003.
FirstSouthwest was successful in obtaining upgraded ratings for the authority from Moody’s and S&P. The ratings were raised from A3 to A2 and from A-minus to A, recognizing, among other things, the authority’s ability to manage and implement large capital plans, while not relying on future toll increases. Additionally, the rating agencies cited the authority’s strong projected coverage after considerable near-term bonding, and ample cash reserves which provided significant liquidity.
 
By restructuring the outstanding debt, the authority saved approximately $3.4 million on the bond issue by issuing the debt on a parity basis.
 
In addition, the savings on the refunding resulted in a savings of more than $32 million for the authority. By incorporating the use of synthetic fixed-rate debt into the overall financing plan, FirstSouthwest was able to provide a more flexible financing structure and increase the refunding savings by approximately $4.5 million.
 
Restructuring the outstanding debt and taking advantage of low long-term interest rates also allowed the authority to cash fund a higher percentage of its capital projects and lower its reliance on future debt issues.
 
 
Case Study - Stage Two
FirstSouthwest restructures Expressway Authority’s debt, expands capital program by hundreds of millions of dollars (2003)
 
Background
In March 2005, the authority issued an additional $499 million of synthetic fixed-rate bonds to fund its recently expanded $1.2 billion five-year work plan.
 
The Challenge
Rising interest rates in early 2004 caused the value of the authority’s $1.2 billion program to shrink to $950 million without pursuing a toll rate increase.
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
Tasked with finding a way to fund the increased work plan, FirstSouthwest met this challenge through defeasing a small amount of bonds during the first few years and using the capital planning model to structure the new debt to include a forward starting interest rate lock in July 2004.
 
Using the capital-planning model the authority was able to show the rating agencies the affordability of the plan at the rate lock level, and as a result, received an upgrade from Moody’s to A-1.
 
The Result
By entering into a forward-starting swap and locking in the interest rates, FirstSouthwest was able to restore much of the program’s original $1.2 billion value. This enabled the authority to pursue its expanded five-year work plan without having to raise tolls.
 
 
Case Study - Stage Three
Forward-starting SIFMA interest rate swap mitigates risk of rising interest rates (2007)
 
Background
In the beginning of the 2007 fiscal year, the authority had a number of goals it wanted to accomplish with the series 2007A financing. After reviewing the authority’s financial situation and goals with respect to funding its five-year work plan (2007-2011), FirstSouthwest recommended the following plan of finance:
  • Issue approximately $425 million of series 2007A new money bonds in June 2007 to partially fund the $1.23 billion five-year work plan. A future $186 million new money debt issue to fund the remaining portion of the authority’s five-year work plan would be completed in June 2008.
  • Execute a forward-starting Securities Industry and Finance Market Association’s (SIFMA) index of tax-exempt variable-rate bonds SIFMA cash settled interest rate swap hedge to mitigate interest rate risk on the planned series 2007A bond issue and increase the amount of the five-year work plan.
The Challenge
In the fall of 2006, as the Bond Buyer Revenue Index interest rate fell to a historic low, FirstSouthwest suggested it might want to revisit the benefits of an interest rate hedge on the series 2007A bonds. The authority wanted to lock in the low rates.
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
The authority’s finance committee agreed to move forward in executing the forward-starting SIFMA interest rate swap hedge in early November 2006, unwind and cash settle the swap, and issue the series 2007A bonds as fixed-rate bonds in June 2007. The forward starting SIFMA interest rate swap hedges were executed on November 2, 2006, at a rate of 4.014 percent. On June 5, 2007, the sale date of the series 2007A bonds, these hedges were terminated and resulted in an $8 million payment to the authority.
 
The Result
The resulting structure of the series 2007A bonds accomplished the goals of the authority. The execution of a forward-starting SIFMA interest rate swap hedge by the expressway authority on November 2, 2006, mitigated the risk of rising interest rates and ensured ongoing funding of the $1.23 billion 2007-2011 five-year work plan.
 
The subsequent rise in interest rates from November 2, 2006, to June 5, 2007, resulted in an $8 million payment to the expressway authority by the swap counterparties (net of all expenses) and resulted in lowering the effective cost of funds on the series 2007A bonds by 0.119 percent.
 
By mitigating the risk of rising interest rates, it was determined that the expressway authority could increase the amount of bonds to be issued and lower its projected debt service coverage without negatively impacting its current ratings
 
 
Case Study - Stage Four
Credit replacement
 
Background
In 2008, FirstSouthwest served as the financial advisor to the expressway authority for the refunding of its outstanding $499 million of variable-rate revenue bonds, subseries 2005 A-1 through E bonds. The expressway authority had approximately $2.2 billion of revenue bonds outstanding including $499 million of variable rate bonds insured by AMBAC Indemnity with a stand-by bond purchase agreement from Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase Bank, SunTrust Bank and Wachovia Bank. The expressway authority’s bonds are rated A1/A/A by Moody’s Investors Service, S&P and Fitch, Inc., respectively.
 
The Challenge
When Ambac was placed on Negative Outlook by S&P on December 19, 2007, the expressway authority began to see a widening of trading values that continued for several months as all three of the rating agencies further lowered the ratings of Ambac and the other bond insurers in the market. The trading differential was more than 400 basis points over SIFMA.
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
FirstSouthwest began discussions with the expressway authority’s current liquidity providers and Ambac about the feasibility of further securing or replacing Ambac with a bank letter of credit. The expressway authority’s goal was to bring the trading differential of the series 2005 bonds in line with its other variable rate bonds while also preserving the previously paid Ambac bond insurance premium and not negatively impacting the expressway authority’s outstanding interest rate swaps.
 
As discussions with Ambac continued, FirstSouthwest and the authority worked to lower the remarketing rates. The existing liquidity providers were asked to provide a temporary LOC on the bonds by amending the
existing stand-by bond purchase agreements for 60 days while FirstSouthwest completed negotiations with Ambac and finalized the refunding. The result of entering into this temporary LOC allowed the authority’s remarketing rate to immediately reduce the trading differential from SIFMA. During this time FirstSouthwest also secured commitments for three-year letters of credit from Bank of America, SunTrust Bank and Wachovia Bank to refinance the entire series 2005 bonds, obtained ratings from all three rating agencies and received a forward commitment from Ambac that the authority would have the option to obtain a future bond insurance and surety bond for no charge over the next three years.
 
The Result
On May 1, 2008, the expressway authority issued its $499 million variable-rate refunding revenue bonds, series 2000B subseries 1–4. Because of the resulting restructuring, the expressway authority’s series 2008B bonds began trading at or below SIFMA.
 

 

Northside Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas

5/31/2009 12:00:00 AM

Case Study: Northside ISD issues $84 million in softput bonds

Client Since: 1984
 
Projects: School Construction
 
Background
Northside Independent School District is one of the fastest growing school districts in Texas. With headquarters in San Antonio, the school district encompasses 316 miles in western Bexar County and has a healthy and growing tax base. Northside ISD has 88 schools and an enrollment of more than 90,000 students. The school district has opened 20 schools in the last six years with 12 more planned to open over the next three years.
 
FirstSouthwest has served as financial advisor to Northside ISD since 1994. FirstSouthwest developed and implemented the school district’s plan of finance which included five bond elections authorizing the issuance of $1.94 billion in general obligation bonds. The plan of finance was modified in 2001 to include both variable rate and traditional fixed rate bonds to finance the school district’s construction program.
 
Since 2001, the school district has utilized both fixed rate and variable rate bond issues to meet its large capital needs for facilities construction. The variable rate bond issues have been sold under a multi-modal bond document that provides the school district with maximum flexibility to finance its capital needs in the short-term market.
 
The school district currently has five variable rate bond issues totaling $312 million in principal amount outstanding. The five variable rate bond issues represent approximately 21 percent of the total bonds outstanding. All but the last variable rate bond issue have liquidity facilities that cost the school district less than 10 basis points per year.
 
The Challenge
Prior to January 2009, all of the school district’s new money variable rate bond issues were sold in a term rate mode of one year or longer with liquidity facilities provided by various banking institutions. The one-year or longer term rate mode minimized the interest risk typically associated with shorter term variable rate bond issues during the fiscal year. When Northside ISD and FirstSouthwest met in early 2009 to develop the plan of finance for the fiscal year, FirstSouthwest advised the school district that liquidity facilities for the upcoming new money variable rate bond issue would be expensive and difficult to obtain. The school district asked FirstSouthwest to explore other options for issuing additional new money variable rate bonds.
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
After exploring various options, FirstSouthwest, in April 2009, recommended the school district consider issuing $84 million in new money variable rate bonds with a two-year soft put structure. The soft put structure for this transaction was possible, despite the difficult market conditions, because of the excellent long-term credit ratings of the school district (Aa2/AA/AA). The school district was able to accommodate the soft put structure in its existing multi-modal bond document with minimal changes. The new money variable rate bonds were priced in May 2009 and closed at the end of May.
 
Results
Because of the school district’s strong ratings and the deep market for the school district’s bonds, the initial interest rate of 2.25 percent was oversubscribed 3.75 times, which subsequently allowed the underwriter to reduce the interest rate to 2.10 percent. The school district administration was pleased with the bond sale because of the attractive interest rate and because the school district retained access to the short-term market with the soft put structure. The school district estimated that the use of the soft put structure will save between $840,000 and $1.26 million in liquidity fees on an annual basis.

Dallas County Hospital District

11/4/2008 12:00:00 AM

Case Study:  $705 million bond sale closes for new Parkland Memorial Hospital

FirstSouthwest Services:  Financial Advisory
 
Background
Dallas County Hospital District which oversees the Parkland Health and Hospital System is the largest county hospital district in the State of Texas based on the number of 2008 discharges. The district operates North Texas’ largest Level I trauma center, a network of community-oriented primary care centers, Parkland Community Health Plan, Parkland Foundation, and healthcare programs at Dallas County’s correctional facilities. A seven-member board appointed by the Dallas County Commissioners Court manages the district.
 
For more than five years, the district’s management, board, and a “Blue Ribbon Committee” appointed by the county commissioners developed a Master Facility Plan to replace the current hospital and on-campus clinics to be financed through cash reserves, philanthropy and debt issuance. The Master Facility Plan assumptions included: 1) $705 million of tax supported bonds, 2) $42 million of combination tax and parking revenue bonds, 3) an annual tax base growth factor of 3 percent, and 4) a borrowing rate for the bonds of 4.5 percent. 
 
As part of the financing plan and proposition to the voters, the district projected an interest and sinking tax rate increase of $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation for two years and a rate of not more than $0.025 cents per year thereafter. The district also projected an increase of $0.01 per $100 assessed valuation to its annual operating tax rate. Dallas County voters approved the $1.2 billion Master Facility Plan and $747 million of combination tax and revenue bonds by more than an 82 percent affirmative vote on November 4, 2008. 
 
The Challenge
Between the election on November 4, 2008 and the delivery of the bonds on September 17, 2009, the bond market experienced extreme turbulence. Premium credit quality was in high demand. However, interest rates on all municipal bonds rose sharply. Further, when the district received its preliminary tax base estimate, the tax base had decreased by approximately 3.3 percent. Both of these factors led to concern that the district could not meet its projected tax impact targets and that the debt funding component of the Master Facility Plan would have to be reduced accordingly. Any reduction to the debt component of the plan would have to be offset by either increased fundraising or an increase to the district’s “equity” contribution. Otherwise, the district was faced with scaling back its capital investment by an amount equal to its reduction in debt capacity.
 
As part of the Federal Stimulus Package, a new debt structure called Build America Bonds was created for governmental capital projects. Governmental hospitals are unique in that they are among the only healthcare issuers to qualify for BABs. As the capital markets and bond market slowly improved, it became apparent that the district could meet its benchmark goal of 4.5 percent cost of debt. However, also clear was that the district would need the highest bond ratings possible to achieve the full benefit that the BAB market offered. 
 
The FirstSouthwest Solution
While Dallas County enjoyed Aaa/AAA bond ratings on its tax supported debt, no precedent was set with any of the three rating agencies for a public health system to achieve a “parity” rating with its "parent's" overlapping debt. Indeed, the rating agencies all tend to rate public health systems at least one-half of a rating category lower. FirstSouthwest worked with the district more than a year in advance of the bond issue to identify the specific concerns of all three agencies. Based upon the results of this work and the district's desire to secure a AAA rating outcome, the district approached only two of the three agencies with a strong argument for parity, AAA ratings with the county’s bonds.
 
By highlighting its conservative fiscal management, solid tax base, substantial cash reserves, strong legal structure including a trust indenture for taxes pledged to the bonds and overwhelming voter and county support, the district was able to secure AAA ratings from both S&P and Fitch. Parkland Health & Hospital System is the only AAA rated hospital in the nation. In addition, the district is one of only two public hospitals in Texas to receive parity ratings with the general obligation ratings of “the parent” county.
 
With the highest credit ratings available in hand, the district took advantage of the BAB program provided by the Federal Stimulus Package. The district issued three series of bonds to achieve the lowest cost of funds with the most flexibility. Tax-exempt bonds offered the lowest yield on the front end of the curve, thus the district sold tax-exempt maturities from 2014 to 2016. BABs were more advantageous for the remaining maturities. 
 
To attract the greatest investor interest and to provide the lowest cost of funds, the district structured make-whole call, term bonds for the majority of its debt structure. To maintain some call flexibility, the district sold $222 million of higher yielding, 10-year par call BABs.  Further, special care was taken to ensure that in excess of $250 million of par value was built into the long term maturity. This sizing of the term bond allowed it to be included in the Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index, a qualifier that many institutional, taxable bond investors view as providing additional liquidity and price transparency to a bond issue and that the underwriters indicated would maximize investor demand for the offering.
 
Results
The bond sale closed in just three days. The overall structure resulted in an all in TIC of 3.71 percent, well below the targeted 4.50 percent. Because of the extraordinarily low cost of funds, the district’s board and the county commissioners were willing to move forward with fully funding the entire tax-supported debt portion of the Master Facility Plan. This ensured that the community would benefit from the full scope of the replacement facility. Additionally, the utilization of BABs as compared to a structure of only tax-exempt bonds is estimated to have resulted in a net present value savings to Dallas County taxpayers of more than $119 million.

Recent Transactions

123456789
DateAmountClient NameClient LocationTransaction TypeSector
12/30/2009$587,000.00Johnston, RIRhode IslandLease Revenue 09Town
12/30/2009$880,000.00La FeriaTexasUtil Sys Rev Bds, S09City
12/30/2009$18,000,000.00Pflugerville ISDTexasUT School Bldg Bonds, S09Independent School District
12/30/2009$44,000,000.00Los Angeles CCDCaliforniaTxbl COPs 09Higher Education
12/29/2009$18,000,000.00Methodist Hospital, Henderson KentuckyKentuckyRev Rfdg Bonds VRHospital Authority
12/29/2009$12,000,000.00Methodist Hospital, Henderson KentuckyKentuckyRev Rfdg Bonds Fixed RateHospital Authority
12/29/2009$22,320,000.00Rhode Island HEBCRhode IslandQualifed Schl Const Bds 09 (Providence)Other - Misc.
12/28/2009$345,000.00Woonsocket, RIRhode IslandGO TANs 09City
12/18/2009$2,945,000.00BreckenridgeTexasGO Rfdg Bds, S09City
12/18/2009$3,540,000.00Cinco Southwest MUD 1TexasBANs 09CMunicipal Utility District
12/18/2009$3,069,000.00Cinco Southwest MUD 4TexasBANs 09AMunicipal Utility District
12/17/2009$19,925,000.00Univ of Central FloridaFloridaTE & Txble Promissory Note, S09Higher Education
12/17/2009$10,195,000.00Sarasota Co, FLFloridaCap Imp Rev Bds Txbl (BABs), S09ACounty
12/17/2009$10,130,000.00Sarasota Co, FLFloridaCap Imp Bds, S09B (BABs - RZEDB)County
12/17/2009$3,350,000.00Mississippi, State ofMississippiLease Rev COPs 09BState Agency/Authority
12/17/2009$700,000.00Princeton, MAMassachusettsBANs 09Town
12/17/2009$147,500,000.00New Jersey Tran Trust Fin AuthNew JerseyTSB Series 2009D (VR)State Agency/Authority
12/17/2009$55,000,000.00Peace River/Manasota RWSA FLFloridaPeace River - Regional Pipeline Loop SysWater Authority
12/17/2009$4,000,000.00Palm Coast, FLFloridaRedevelopment Revenue Note, S09City
12/17/2009$7,560,000.00Paradise ISDTexasUntld Tax School Bldg Rfdg Bds S09Independent School District
123456789

Case Studies

  • Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, Florida

  • Dallas County Hospital District

  • City of Kingsville, Texas

  • Dallas Convention Center Hotel

  • Northside Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas

  • Alaska Housing Finance Corporation

Employee Search

  Search